CiteFuse is a computational framework that implements a
suite of methods and tools for CITE-seq data from pre-processing through
to integrative analytics. This includes doublet detection, network-based
modality integration, cell type clustering, differential RNA and protein
expression analysis, ADT evaluation, ligand-receptor interaction
analysis, and interactive web-based visualisation of the analyses. This
vignette demonstrates the usage of CiteFuse on a subset
data of CITE-seq data from human PBMCs as an example (Mimitou et al.,
2019).
First, install CiteFuse using
BiocManager.
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) {
install.packages("BiocManager")
}
BiocManager::install("CiteFuse")data("CITEseq_example", package = "CiteFuse")
names(CITEseq_example)
#> [1] "RNA" "ADT" "HTO"
lapply(CITEseq_example, dim)
#> $RNA
#> [1] 19521 500
#>
#> $ADT
#> [1] 49 500
#>
#> $HTO
#> [1] 4 500Here, we start from a list of three matrices of unique molecular
identifier (UMI), antibody derived tags (ADT) and hashtag
oligonucleotide (HTO) count, which have common cell names. There are 500
cells in our subsetted dataset. And characteristically of CITE-seq data,
the matrices are matched, meaning that for any given cell we know the
expression level of their RNA transcripts (genome-wide) and its
corresponding cell surface protein expression. The
preprocessing function will utilise the three matrices and
its common cell names to create a SingleCellExperiment
object, which stores RNA data in an assay and
ADT and HTO data within in the
altExp slot.
sce_citeseq <- preprocessing(CITEseq_example)
sce_citeseq
#> class: SingleCellExperiment
#> dim: 19521 500
#> metadata(0):
#> assays(1): counts
#> rownames(19521): hg19_AL627309.1 hg19_AL669831.5 ... hg19_MT-ND6
#> hg19_MT-CYB
#> rowData names(0):
#> colnames(500): AAGCCGCGTTGTCTTT GATCGCGGTTATCGGT ... TTGGCAACACTAGTAC
#> GCTGCGAGTTGTGGCC
#> colData names(0):
#> reducedDimNames(0):
#> mainExpName: NULL
#> altExpNames(2): ADT HTOCiteFuseThe function normaliseExprs is used to scale the
alternative expression. Here, we used it to perform log-transformation
of the HTO count, by setting
transform = "log".
Then we can perform dimension reduction on the HTO count
by using runTSNE or runUMAP, then use
visualiseDim function to visualise the reduced dimension
plot. Our CITE-seq dataset contain data from four samples that were
pooled before sequencing. The samples were multiplexed through cell
hashing (Stoekius et al., 2018). The four clusters observed on reduced
dimension plots equate to the four different samples.
sce_citeseq <- scater::runTSNE(sce_citeseq,
altexp = "HTO",
name = "TSNE_HTO",
pca = TRUE)
visualiseDim(sce_citeseq,
dimNames = "TSNE_HTO") + labs(title = "tSNE (HTO)")
sce_citeseq <- scater::runUMAP(sce_citeseq,
altexp = "HTO",
name = "UMAP_HTO")
visualiseDim(sce_citeseq,
dimNames = "UMAP_HTO") + labs(title = "UMAP (HTO)")An important step in single cell data analysis is the removal of
doublets. Doublets form as a result of co-encapsulation of cells within
a droplet, leading to a hybrid transcriptome from two or more cells. In
CiteFuse, we implement a step-wise doublet detection approach to remove
doublets. We first identify the cross-sample doublets via the
crossSampleDoublets function.
sce_citeseq <- crossSampleDoublets(sce_citeseq)
#> number of iterations= 20
#> number of iterations= 24
#> number of iterations= 46
#> number of iterations= 50The results of the cross sample doublets are then saved in
colData as doubletClassify_between_label and
doubletClassify_between_class.
table(sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_between_label)
#>
#> 1 2 3 4
#> 115 121 92 129
#> doublet/multiplet
#> 43
table(sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_between_class)
#>
#> Singlet doublet/multiplet
#> 457 43We can then highlight the cross-sample doublets in our tSNE plot of HTO count.
Furthermore, plotHTO function allows us to plot the
pairwise scatter HTO count. Any cells that show co-expression of
orthologocal HTOs (red) are considered as doublets.
We then identify the within-sample doublets via the
withinSampleDoublets function.
The results of the cross sample doublets are then saved in the
colData as doubletClassify_within_label and
doubletClassify_within_class.
table(sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_within_label)
#>
#> Doublets(Within)_1 Doublets(Within)_2 Doublets(Within)_3 Doublets(Within)_4
#> 3 7 4 6
#> NotDoublets(Within)
#> 480
table(sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_within_class)
#>
#> Doublet Singlet
#> 20 480Again, we can visualise the within-sample doublets in our tSNE plot.
Finally, we can filter out the doublet cells (both within and between batches) for the downstream analysis.
sce_citeseq <- sce_citeseq[, sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_within_class == "Singlet" & sce_citeseq$doubletClassify_between_class == "Singlet"]
sce_citeseq
#> class: SingleCellExperiment
#> dim: 19521 437
#> metadata(3): doubletClassify_between_threshold
#> doubletClassify_between_resultsMat doubletClassify_within_resultsMat
#> assays(1): counts
#> rownames(19521): hg19_AL627309.1 hg19_AL669831.5 ... hg19_MT-ND6
#> hg19_MT-CYB
#> rowData names(0):
#> colnames(437): GATCGCGGTTATCGGT GGCTGGTAGAGGTTAT ... TTGGCAACACTAGTAC
#> GCTGCGAGTTGTGGCC
#> colData names(5): doubletClassify_between_label
#> doubletClassify_between_class nUMI doubletClassify_within_label
#> doubletClassify_within_class
#> reducedDimNames(2): TSNE_HTO UMAP_HTO
#> mainExpName: NULL
#> altExpNames(2): ADT HTOThe first step of analysis is to integrate the RNA and ADT matrix. We use a popular integration algorithm called similarity network fusion (SNF) to integrate the multiomic data.
sce_citeseq <- scater::logNormCounts(sce_citeseq)
sce_citeseq <- normaliseExprs(sce_citeseq, altExp_name = "ADT", transform = "log")
system.time(sce_citeseq <- CiteFuse(sce_citeseq))
#> Calculating affinity matrix
#> Performing SNF
#> user system elapsed
#> 1.301 0.651 0.988We now proceed with the fused matrix, which is stored as
SNF_W in our sce_citeseq object.
CiteFuse implements two different clustering algorithms on the fused
matrix, spectral clustering and Louvain clustering. First, we perform
spectral clustering with sufficient numbers of K and use
the eigen values to determine the optimal number of clusters.
SNF_W_clust <- spectralClustering(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["SNF_W"]], K = 20)
#> Computing Spectral Clustering
plot(SNF_W_clust$eigen_values)Using the optimal cluster number defined from the previous step, we
can now use the spectralClutering function to cluster the
single cells by specifying the number of clusters in K. The
function takes a cell-to-cell similarity matrix as an input. We have
already created the fused similarity matrix from CiteFuse.
Since the CiteFuse function creates and stores the
similarity matries from ADT and RNA expression, as well the fused
matrix, we can use these two to compare the clustering outcomes by data
modality.
SNF_W_clust <- spectralClustering(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["SNF_W"]], K = 5)
#> Computing Spectral Clustering
sce_citeseq$SNF_W_clust <- as.factor(SNF_W_clust$labels)
SNF_W1_clust <- spectralClustering(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["ADT_W"]], K = 5)
#> Computing Spectral Clustering
sce_citeseq$ADT_clust <- as.factor(SNF_W1_clust$labels)
SNF_W2_clust <- spectralClustering(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["RNA_W"]], K = 5)
#> Computing Spectral Clustering
sce_citeseq$RNA_clust <- as.factor(SNF_W2_clust$labels)The outcome of the clustering can be easily visualised on a reduced dimensions plot by highlighting the points by cluster label.
sce_citeseq <- reducedDimSNF(sce_citeseq,
method = "tSNE",
dimNames = "tSNE_joint")
g1 <- visualiseDim(sce_citeseq, dimNames = "tSNE_joint", colour_by = "SNF_W_clust") +
labs(title = "tSNE (SNF clustering)")
g2 <- visualiseDim(sce_citeseq, dimNames = "tSNE_joint", colour_by = "ADT_clust") +
labs(title = "tSNE (ADT clustering)")
g3 <- visualiseDim(sce_citeseq, dimNames = "tSNE_joint", colour_by = "RNA_clust") +
labs(title = "tSNE (RNA clustering)")
library(gridExtra)
grid.arrange(g3, g2, g1, ncol = 2)The expression of genes and proteins can be visualised by changing
the colour_by parameter to assess the clusters. As an
example, we highlight the plot by the RNA and ADT expression level of
CD8.
g1 <- visualiseDim(sce_citeseq, dimNames = "tSNE_joint",
colour_by = "hg19_CD8A",
data_from = "assay",
assay_name = "logcounts") +
labs(title = "tSNE: hg19_CD8A (RNA expression)")
g2 <- visualiseDim(sce_citeseq,dimNames = "tSNE_joint",
colour_by = "CD8",
data_from = "altExp",
altExp_assay_name = "logcounts") +
labs(title = "tSNE: CD8 (ADT expression)")
grid.arrange(g1, g2, ncol = 2)As well as spectral clustering, CiteFuse can implement Louvain
clustering if users wish to use another clustering method. We use the
igraph package, and any community detection algorithms
available in their package can be selected by changing the
method parameter.
SNF_W_louvain <- igraphClustering(sce_citeseq, method = "louvain")
table(SNF_W_louvain)
#> SNF_W_louvain
#> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#> 88 139 62 32 51 29 36
sce_citeseq$SNF_W_louvain <- as.factor(SNF_W_louvain)
visualiseDim(sce_citeseq, dimNames = "tSNE_joint", colour_by = "SNF_W_louvain") +
labs(title = "tSNE (SNF louvain clustering)")CiteFuse has a wide range of visualisation tools to facilitate
exploratory analysis of CITE-seq data. The visualiseExprs
function is an easy-to-use function to generate boxplots, violinplots,
jitter plots, density plots, and pairwise scatter/density plots of genes
and proteins expressed in the data. The plots can be grouped by using
the cluster labels stored in the sce_citeseq object.
visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq,
plot = "boxplot",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("hg19_CD2", "hg19_CD4", "hg19_CD8A", "hg19_CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq,
plot = "violin",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("hg19_CD2", "hg19_CD4", "hg19_CD8A", "hg19_CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq,
plot = "jitter",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("hg19_CD2", "hg19_CD4", "hg19_CD8A", "hg19_CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq,
plot = "density",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("hg19_CD2", "hg19_CD4", "hg19_CD8A", "hg19_CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq,
altExp_name = "ADT",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
plot = "violin", n = 5)visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq, altExp_name = "ADT",
plot = "jitter",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("CD2", "CD8", "CD4", "CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq, altExp_name = "ADT",
plot = "density",
group_by = "SNF_W_louvain",
feature_subset = c("CD2", "CD8", "CD4", "CD19"))visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq, altExp_name = "ADT",
plot = "pairwise",
feature_subset = c("CD4", "CD8"))
#> number of iterations= 25
#> number of iterations= 24
visualiseExprs(sce_citeseq, altExp_name = "ADT",
plot = "pairwise",
feature_subset = c("CD45RA", "CD4", "CD8"),
threshold = rep(4, 3))CiteFuse also calculates differentially expressed (DE) genes through
the DEgenes function. The cluster grouping to use must be
specified in the group parameter. If
altExp_name is not specified, RNA expression will be used
as the default expression matrix.
Results form the DE analysis is stored in sce_citeseq as
DE_res_RNA_filter and DE_res_ADT_filter for
RNA and ADT expression, respectively.
# DE will be performed for RNA if altExp_name = "none"
sce_citeseq <- DEgenes(sce_citeseq,
altExp_name = "none",
group = sce_citeseq$SNF_W_louvain,
return_all = TRUE,
exprs_pct = 0.5)
sce_citeseq <- selectDEgenes(sce_citeseq,
altExp_name = "none")
datatable(format(do.call(rbind, metadata(sce_citeseq)[["DE_res_RNA_filter"]]),
digits = 2))The DE genes can be visualised with the DEbubblePlot and
DEcomparisonPlot. In each case, the gene names must first
be extracted from the DE result objects.
The circlepackPlot takes a list of all DE genes from RNA
and ADT DE analysis and will plot only the top most significant DE genes
to plot.
rna_DEgenes <- metadata(sce_citeseq)[["DE_res_RNA_filter"]]
adt_DEgenes <- metadata(sce_citeseq)[["DE_res_ADT_filter"]]
rna_DEgenes <- lapply(rna_DEgenes, function(x){
x$name <- gsub("hg19_", "", x$name)
x})
DEbubblePlot(list(RNA = rna_DEgenes, ADT = adt_DEgenes))For the DEcomparisonPlot, as well as a list containing
the DE genes for RNA and ADT, a feature_list specifying the
genes and proteins of interest is required.
rna_list <- c("hg19_CD4",
"hg19_CD8A",
"hg19_HLA-DRB1",
"hg19_ITGAX",
"hg19_NCAM1",
"hg19_CD27",
"hg19_CD19")
adt_list <- c("CD4", "CD8", "MHCII (HLA-DR)", "CD11c", "CD56", "CD27", "CD19")
rna_DEgenes_all <- metadata(sce_citeseq)[["DE_res_RNA"]]
adt_DEgenes_all <- metadata(sce_citeseq)[["DE_res_ADT"]]
feature_list <- list(RNA = rna_list, ADT = adt_list)
de_list <- list(RNA = rna_DEgenes_all, ADT = adt_DEgenes_all)
DEcomparisonPlot(de_list = de_list,
feature_list = feature_list)An important evaluation in CITE-seq data analysis is to assess the quality of each ADT and to evaluate the contribution of ADTs towards clustering outcome. CiteFuse calculates the relative importance of ADT towards clustering outcome by using a random forest model. The higher the score of an ADT, the greater its importance towards the final clustering outcome.
set.seed(2020)
sce_citeseq <- importanceADT(sce_citeseq,
group = sce_citeseq$SNF_W_louvain,
subsample = TRUE)
visImportance(sce_citeseq, plot = "boxplot")
sort(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["importanceADT"]], decreasing = TRUE)[1:20]
#> CD27 CD8 CD4 CD28
#> 39.470893 36.274249 33.235362 12.633975
#> CD5 PECAM (CD31) CD11b CD7
#> 11.843918 11.780143 11.393725 11.304905
#> IL7Ralpha (CD127) MHCII (HLA-DR) CD2 CD44
#> 10.044518 8.732073 8.333783 7.781941
#> CD366 (tim3) HLA-A,B,C CD11c CD3
#> 6.437104 5.596078 5.238851 4.580886
#> CD45RA PD-1 (CD279) CD69 PD1 (CD279)
#> 3.978908 3.834483 3.727649 3.570590The importance scores can be visualised in a boxplot and heatmap. Our evaluation of ADT importance show that unsurprisingly CD4 and CD8 are the top two discriminating proteins in PBMCs.
Let us try clustering with only ADTs with a score greater than 5.
subset_adt <- names(which(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["importanceADT"]] > 5))
subset_adt
#> [1] "CD11b" "CD11c" "CD2"
#> [4] "CD27" "CD28" "CD366 (tim3)"
#> [7] "CD4" "CD44" "CD5"
#> [10] "CD7" "CD8" "HLA-A,B,C"
#> [13] "IL7Ralpha (CD127)" "MHCII (HLA-DR)" "PECAM (CD31)"
system.time(sce_citeseq <- CiteFuse(sce_citeseq,
ADT_subset = subset_adt,
metadata_names = c("W_SNF_adtSubset1",
"W_ADT_adtSubset1",
"W_RNA")))
#> Calculating affinity matrix
#> Performing SNF
#> user system elapsed
#> 1.203 0.411 0.910
SNF_W_clust_adtSubset1 <- spectralClustering(metadata(sce_citeseq)[["W_SNF_adtSubset1"]], K = 5)
#> Computing Spectral Clustering
sce_citeseq$SNF_W_clust_adtSubset1 <- as.factor(SNF_W_clust_adtSubset1$labels)
library(mclust)
adjustedRandIndex(sce_citeseq$SNF_W_clust_adtSubset1, sce_citeseq$SNF_W_clust)
#> [1] 0.8646855When we compare between the two clustering outcomes, we find that the adjusted rand index is approximately 0.93, where a value of 1 denotes complete concordance.
The geneADTnetwork function plots an interaction network
between genes identified from the DE analysis. The nodes denote proteins
and RNA whilst the edges denote positive and negative correlation in
expression.
RNA_feature_subset <- unique(as.character(unlist(lapply(rna_DEgenes_all, "[[", "name"))))
ADT_feature_subset <- unique(as.character(unlist(lapply(adt_DEgenes_all, "[[", "name"))))
geneADTnetwork(sce_citeseq,
RNA_feature_subset = RNA_feature_subset,
ADT_feature_subset = ADT_feature_subset,
cor_method = "pearson",
network_layout = igraph::layout_with_fr)#> IGRAPH e91d228 UN-B 72 134 --
#> + attr: name (v/c), label (v/c), class (v/c), type (v/l), shape (v/c),
#> | color (v/c), size (v/n), label.cex (v/n), label.color (v/c), value
#> | (e/n), color (e/c), weights (e/n)
#> + edges from e91d228 (vertex names):
#> [1] RNA_hg19_CD8A --ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_CCL5 --ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_GNLY --ADT_CD4
#> [4] RNA_hg19_KLRD1--ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_GZMB --ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_CST7 --ADT_CD4
#> [7] RNA_hg19_NKG7 --ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_CTSW --ADT_CD4 RNA_hg19_LTB --ADT_CD27
#> [10] RNA_hg19_TCF7 --ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_RPL32--ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_IL7R --ADT_CD27
#> [13] RNA_hg19_RPL13--ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_RPL37--ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_RPS8 --ADT_CD27
#> [16] RNA_hg19_RPL11--ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_CD27 --ADT_CD27 RNA_hg19_RPS12--ADT_CD27
#> + ... omitted several edges
With the advent of CITE-seq, we can now predict ligand-receptor
interactions by using cell surface protein expression. CiteFuse
implements a ligandReceptorTest to find ligand receptor
interactions between sender and receiver cells. Importantly, the ADT
count is used to predict receptor expression within receiver cells. Note
that the setting altExp_name = "RNA" would enable users to
predict ligand-receptor interaction from RNA expression only.
data("lr_pair_subset", package = "CiteFuse")
head(lr_pair_subset)
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] "hg19_IL17RA" "CD45"
#> [2,] "hg19_FAS" "CD11b"
#> [3,] "hg19_GZMK" "CD62L"
#> [4,] "hg19_CD40LG" "CD11b"
#> [5,] "hg19_FLT3LG" "CD62L"
#> [6,] "hg19_GZMA" "CD19"
sce_citeseq <- normaliseExprs(sce = sce_citeseq,
altExp_name = "ADT",
transform = "zi_minMax")
sce_citeseq <- normaliseExprs(sce = sce_citeseq,
altExp_name = "none",
exprs_value = "logcounts",
transform = "minMax")
sce_citeseq <- ligandReceptorTest(sce = sce_citeseq,
ligandReceptor_list = lr_pair_subset,
cluster = sce_citeseq$SNF_W_louvain,
RNA_exprs_value = "minMax",
use_alt_exp = TRUE,
altExp_name = "ADT",
altExp_exprs_value = "zi_minMax",
num_permute = 1000)
#> 100 ......200 ......300 ......400 ......500 ......600 ......700 ......800 ......900 ......1000 ......Lastly, we will jointly analyse the current PBMC CITE-seq data, taken
from healthy human donors, and another subset of CITE-seq data from
patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), again from Mimitou et
al. (2019). The data sce_ctcl_subset provided in our
CiteFuse package already contains the clustering
information.
To visualise and compare gene or protein expression data, we can use
visualiseExprsList function.
visualiseExprsList(sce_list = list(control = sce_citeseq,
ctcl = sce_ctcl_subset),
plot = "boxplot",
altExp_name = "none",
exprs_value = "logcounts",
feature_subset = c("hg19_S100A10", "hg19_CD8A"),
group_by = c("SNF_W_louvain", "SNF_W_louvain"))
visualiseExprsList(sce_list = list(control = sce_citeseq,
ctcl = sce_ctcl_subset),
plot = "boxplot",
altExp_name = "ADT",
feature_subset = c("CD19", "CD8"),
group_by = c("SNF_W_louvain", "SNF_W_louvain"))We can then perform differential expression analysis of the RNA expression level across the two clusters that have high CD19 expression in ADT.
de_res <- DEgenesCross(sce_list = list(control = sce_citeseq,
ctcl = sce_ctcl_subset),
colData_name = c("SNF_W_louvain", "SNF_W_louvain"),
group_to_test = c("2", "6"))
de_res_filter <- selectDEgenes(de_res = de_res)
de_res_filter
#> $control
#> stats.W pval p.adjust meanExprs.1 meanExprs.2
#> hg19_GNLY 28.0 5.642738e-23 5.642738e-23 0.07220401 4.585384
#> hg19_CST7 152.5 3.913672e-21 3.913672e-21 0.22512314 2.630719
#> hg19_NKG7 168.0 7.860013e-21 7.860013e-21 0.51066894 3.812262
#> hg19_GZMH 301.0 1.567852e-19 1.567852e-19 0.00000000 1.967411
#> hg19_GZMB 498.0 5.422652e-17 5.422652e-17 0.11667246 2.006243
#> hg19_CCL5 477.0 8.039376e-17 8.039376e-17 1.04348029 3.777290
#> hg19_FGFBP2 571.0 2.154067e-16 2.154067e-16 0.03101677 1.651125
#> hg19_KLRD1 598.0 6.180246e-16 6.180246e-16 0.09327555 1.564246
#> hg19_EFHD2 794.0 3.699717e-14 3.699717e-14 0.02064028 1.210523
#> hg19_PRF1 803.5 6.796491e-14 6.796491e-14 0.06473009 1.461993
#> meanPct.1 meanPct.2 meanDiff pctDiff name group
#> hg19_GNLY 0.02325581 0.9928058 4.513180 0.9695499 hg19_GNLY control
#> hg19_CST7 0.13953488 0.9928058 2.405596 0.8532709 hg19_CST7 control
#> hg19_NKG7 0.30232558 1.0000000 3.301593 0.6976744 hg19_NKG7 control
#> hg19_GZMH 0.00000000 0.8992806 1.967411 0.8992806 hg19_GZMH control
#> hg19_GZMB 0.06976744 0.8776978 1.889570 0.8079304 hg19_GZMB control
#> hg19_CCL5 0.37209302 1.0000000 2.733809 0.6279070 hg19_CCL5 control
#> hg19_FGFBP2 0.02325581 0.8201439 1.620108 0.7968881 hg19_FGFBP2 control
#> hg19_KLRD1 0.09302326 0.8273381 1.470971 0.7343149 hg19_KLRD1 control
#> hg19_EFHD2 0.02325581 0.7410072 1.189883 0.7177514 hg19_EFHD2 control
#> hg19_PRF1 0.04651163 0.7625899 1.397263 0.7160783 hg19_PRF1 control
#>
#> $ctcl
#> stats.W pval p.adjust meanExprs.1 meanExprs.2
#> hg19_LTB 372.0 3.139096e-28 3.139096e-28 0.10343246 1.978730
#> hg19_RPS26 0.0 4.172127e-23 4.172127e-23 1.64098856 5.072471
#> hg19_IL7R 780.0 1.412936e-20 1.412936e-20 0.17329085 1.651591
#> hg19_SELL 1033.5 8.045007e-20 8.045007e-20 0.07322948 1.152572
#> hg19_LEPROTL1 715.0 2.219774e-18 2.219774e-18 0.24294829 1.300745
#> hg19_EEF1B2 523.5 3.123434e-16 3.123434e-16 1.71942732 3.043623
#> hg19_HBB 1737.5 1.285550e-15 1.285550e-15 0.00000000 0.431026
#> hg19_NOSIP 1044.0 1.332385e-14 1.332385e-14 0.19852399 1.157235
#> hg19_FOS 1324.0 3.386001e-13 3.386001e-13 0.16536118 1.125337
#> hg19_NPM1 945.0 1.042899e-11 1.042899e-11 1.17875475 2.202268
#> meanPct.1 meanPct.2 meanDiff pctDiff name group
#> hg19_LTB 0.07913669 0.9069767 1.8752977 0.8278401 hg19_LTB ctcl
#> hg19_RPS26 0.89208633 1.0000000 3.4314820 0.1079137 hg19_RPS26 ctcl
#> hg19_IL7R 0.10791367 0.8139535 1.4782997 0.7060398 hg19_IL7R ctcl
#> hg19_SELL 0.05755396 0.6976744 1.0793420 0.6401205 hg19_SELL ctcl
#> hg19_LEPROTL1 0.19424460 0.9069767 1.0577972 0.7127321 hg19_LEPROTL1 ctcl
#> hg19_EEF1B2 0.86330935 0.9767442 1.3241960 0.1134348 hg19_EEF1B2 ctcl
#> hg19_HBB 0.00000000 0.4186047 0.4310260 0.4186047 hg19_HBB ctcl
#> hg19_NOSIP 0.19424460 0.7674419 0.9587114 0.5731973 hg19_NOSIP ctcl
#> hg19_FOS 0.12230216 0.6511628 0.9599762 0.5288606 hg19_FOS ctcl
#> hg19_NPM1 0.73381295 0.9534884 1.0235132 0.2196754 hg19_NPM1 ctclReaders unfamiliar with the workflow of converting a count matrix
into a SingleCellExperiment object may use the
readFrom10X function to convert count matrix from a 10X
experiment into an object that can be used for all functions in
CiteFuse.
tmpdir <- tempdir()
download.file("http://cf.10xgenomics.com/samples/cell-exp/3.1.0/connect_5k_pbmc_NGSC3_ch1/connect_5k_pbmc_NGSC3_ch1_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.tar.gz", file.path(tmpdir, "/5k_pbmc_NGSC3_ch1_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.tar.gz"))
untar(file.path(tmpdir, "5k_pbmc_NGSC3_ch1_filtered_feature_bc_matrix.tar.gz"),
exdir = tmpdir)
sce_citeseq_10X <- readFrom10X(file.path(tmpdir, "filtered_feature_bc_matrix/"))
sce_citeseq_10XsessionInfo()
#> R version 4.5.2 (2025-10-31)
#> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
#> Running under: Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libblas.so.3
#> LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libopenblasp-r0.3.26.so; LAPACK version 3.12.0
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
#> [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C
#> [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
#> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
#> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
#> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
#>
#> time zone: Etc/UTC
#> tzcode source: system (glibc)
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
#> [8] base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] mclust_6.1.2 gridExtra_2.3
#> [3] DT_0.34.0 scater_1.39.2
#> [5] ggplot2_4.0.1 scuttle_1.21.0
#> [7] SingleCellExperiment_1.33.0 SummarizedExperiment_1.41.0
#> [9] Biobase_2.71.0 GenomicRanges_1.63.1
#> [11] Seqinfo_1.1.0 IRanges_2.45.0
#> [13] S4Vectors_0.49.0 BiocGenerics_0.57.0
#> [15] generics_0.1.4 MatrixGenerics_1.23.0
#> [17] matrixStats_1.5.0 CiteFuse_1.23.0
#> [19] BiocStyle_2.39.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] rlang_1.1.7 magrittr_2.0.4 otel_0.2.0
#> [4] ggridges_0.5.7 compiler_4.5.2 vctrs_0.7.1
#> [7] reshape2_1.4.5 stringr_1.6.0 pkgconfig_2.0.3
#> [10] fastmap_1.2.0 XVector_0.51.0 labeling_0.4.3
#> [13] ggraph_2.2.2 rmarkdown_2.30 ggbeeswarm_0.7.3
#> [16] purrr_1.2.1 bluster_1.21.0 xfun_0.56
#> [19] beachmat_2.27.2 randomForest_4.7-1.2 cachem_1.1.0
#> [22] jsonlite_2.0.0 rhdf5filters_1.23.3 DelayedArray_0.37.0
#> [25] BiocParallel_1.45.0 Rhdf5lib_1.33.0 tweenr_2.0.3
#> [28] cluster_2.1.8.1 irlba_2.3.5.1 parallel_4.5.2
#> [31] R6_2.6.1 bslib_0.10.0 stringi_1.8.7
#> [34] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 limma_3.67.0 compositions_2.0-9
#> [37] jquerylib_0.1.4 Rcpp_1.1.1 knitr_1.51
#> [40] mixtools_2.0.0.1 FNN_1.1.4.1 Matrix_1.7-4
#> [43] splines_4.5.2 igraph_2.2.1 tidyselect_1.2.1
#> [46] abind_1.4-8 yaml_2.3.12 viridis_0.6.5
#> [49] codetools_0.2-20 lattice_0.22-7 tibble_3.3.1
#> [52] plyr_1.8.9 withr_3.0.2 S7_0.2.1
#> [55] evaluate_1.0.5 Rtsne_0.17 survival_3.8-6
#> [58] bayesm_3.1-7 polyclip_1.10-7 kernlab_0.9-33
#> [61] pillar_1.11.1 BiocManager_1.30.27 tensorA_0.36.2.1
#> [64] plotly_4.12.0 dbscan_1.2.4 scales_1.4.0
#> [67] glue_1.8.0 metapod_1.19.1 pheatmap_1.0.13
#> [70] lazyeval_0.2.2 maketools_1.3.2 tools_4.5.2
#> [73] BiocNeighbors_2.5.2 robustbase_0.99-6 sys_3.4.3
#> [76] data.table_1.18.2.1 RSpectra_0.16-2 ScaledMatrix_1.19.0
#> [79] locfit_1.5-9.12 scran_1.39.0 buildtools_1.0.0
#> [82] graphlayouts_1.2.2 tidygraph_1.3.1 cowplot_1.2.0
#> [85] rhdf5_2.55.12 grid_4.5.2 tidyr_1.3.2
#> [88] crosstalk_1.2.2 edgeR_4.9.2 nlme_3.1-168
#> [91] beeswarm_0.4.0 BiocSingular_1.27.1 ggforce_0.5.0
#> [94] vipor_0.4.7 rsvd_1.0.5 cli_3.6.5
#> [97] segmented_2.2-1 S4Arrays_1.11.1 viridisLite_0.4.2
#> [100] dplyr_1.1.4 uwot_0.2.4 gtable_0.3.6
#> [103] DEoptimR_1.1-4 sass_0.4.10 digest_0.6.39
#> [106] dqrng_0.4.1 SparseArray_1.11.10 ggrepel_0.9.6
#> [109] htmlwidgets_1.6.4 farver_2.1.2 memoise_2.0.1
#> [112] htmltools_0.5.9 lifecycle_1.0.5 httr_1.4.7
#> [115] statmod_1.5.1 MASS_7.3-65